ssenco
Log inSign up
Clinician collaboration

Review school evidence with context, comparison history, and calibration governance.

Clinicians can review edited behaviour signals, audit what changed from the initial extraction, and collaborate with SENCOs using non-diagnostic, evidence-led SEND reasoning workflows.

Open clinician workspaceReview trust posture

Clinicians priorities

Compare initial extraction against reviewer edits

Use confidence explanations, source spans, and trend views

Participate in calibration feedback and release governance

Why clinicians use senco

  • Review school evidence in one place without flattening it into a black-box score.
  • Check the reasoning trace, source spans, and confidence explanations before contributing professional judgement.
  • See how calibration proposals become approved releases and when a release was rolled back.

How governance stays visible

  • Reviewer comparison reports preserve the delta between the first extraction and the final reviewed behaviours.
  • Protected APIs, audit events, and organisation-scoped settings keep calibration and escalation workflows accountable.
  • Synthetic provider probes validate runtime health without exposing pupil content to test prompts.
Related guides

Find the matching workflow documentation.

Human Review, Trends, and Confidence Explanations

Open the public guide hub and product documentation.

Reasoning Calibration Governance

Open the public guide hub and product documentation.

Audit Timeline, Exports, and Admin Monitoring

Open the public guide hub and product documentation.